Cap It Like It’s Hot
US President Trump has intensified his push for a nationwide, one-year 10% cap on credit card interest rates, presenting the proposal as a direct challenge to what he describes as “extortionate” lending practices. Announced as a cornerstone of his second-term affordability agenda, the measure is scheduled to take effect on 20 January 2026. With average credit card rates currently ranging between 20-30%, the administration argues that the policy would provide immediate financial relief to a public burdened by a record $1.23 trillion in revolving debt. Supporters, including an increasingly influential bipartisan coalition, maintain that the cap would function as a substantial “bottom-up” economic stimulus, potentially returning an estimated $100 billion annually to US households and enabling borrowers to reduce principal balances rather than remain trapped in spiralling interest payments.
The proposal reflects the legislative intent of the 10 Percent Credit Card Interest Rate Cap Act, an uncommon point of convergence between populist Republicans and progressive Democrats. Its advocates contend that the modern financial system relies excessively on predatory usury to inflate corporate profits. From an economic perspective, the redirection of funds into consumer hands could strengthen retail demand and enhance housing stability. Financial markets, however, have responded with evident unease. The announcement triggered notable sell-offs across the financial sector, as analysts warned that such an intervention threatens the long-standing risk-based pricing model that underpins consumer lending, raising concerns over a possible contraction in credit availability.
From a macroeconomic standpoint, the proposal carries complex implications for inflation and growth. While the cap would increase disposable income for many households, some economists caution that the resulting surge in consumer demand could become inflationary if it outpaces productive capacity. Conversely, should banks react by sharply tightening lending standards to compensate for lower yields, the economy could face a damaging credit crunch that suppresses GDP growth. There is also concern that a reduced supply of regulated credit may drive high-risk borrowers towards more expensive, unregulated alternatives, thereby increasing systemic vulnerability.
As the deadline approaches, attention is increasingly turning to the long-term stability of the financial markets. The central challenge lies in reconciling immediate consumer relief with the risk of distorting the broader credit cycle. If the cap is interpreted as an encroachment upon the Fed’s authority over the cost of credit, it could elevate long-term inflation expectations and heighten volatility in bond markets. Ultimately, the success of the policy will depend on whether enhanced household purchasing power can outweigh the potential contraction in the velocity of credit across the US economy.
If you would like to receive The Daily Update to your inbox, please email markets@epicip.com or click the link below.