Could Tariffs Push the Fed Toward More Rate Cuts?
Today’s US presidential election promises to shape policy across sectors that touch every corner of the market. Yet, while much of the world is fixated on the outcome, a more complex story of market anxieties is unfolding. Despite the distinct policy directions each candidate might pursue—from trade tariffs to fiscal and environmental policies—market concerns seem to converge on one overarching theme: inflation and its impact on interest rates. Recent tariff tensions, especially those involving China, have stirred fears of rising costs that could, in theory, compel the Federal Reserve to tighten rates. However, a closer look suggests these fears may be overstated. Inflation sparked by tariffs is fundamentally different from the kind that typically spurs rate hikes, and this distinction is critical.
Take trade policy, for example. A second term for Donald Trump could bring escalated tariffs and a shift towards protectionism, raising import costs, particularly for goods from China, and potentially stoking inflation. By contrast, a Kamala Harris administration might pursue a more multilateral approach, reducing trade barriers to ease cost pressures. Yet, whether tariffs rise or fall, the inflation they trigger would primarily be of the “cost-push” variety, where prices rise due to higher import costs rather than increased demand. This distinction matters because the Fed typically addresses demand-driven inflation with rate hikes, not cost-driven price increases that tend to dampen consumer spending.
Markets often fear inflation, associating it with tighter monetary policy. However, tariff-driven inflation could lead to the opposite outcome. Cost-push inflation from higher tariffs functions like a tax, squeezing disposable income and cooling demand. While markets may worry that the Fed will pause rate cuts or even tighten, this reaction seems misplaced. The Fed, aware of the nuances of cost-push inflation, might lean towards easing rates more quickly in response to slower growth and reduced consumer spending power. Tariffs, after all, do not fuel an overheating economy—they act as a burden on it, potentially limiting consumer activity and softening overall economic momentum.
While traders and algorithms may continue to sound the alarm at any sign of inflation, the bigger picture suggests more circumspection. Tariffs and cost-driven inflation do not necessarily signal the need for aggressive rate hikes; instead, they may prompt a restrained approach from a Fed more focused on growth stability than on a temporary inflationary spike. While today’s election will undoubtedly influence policy directions, the potential for tariffs to reduce demand rather than fuel inflation suggests that market fears may be driven more by misinterpretation of economic dynamics than by the candidates' policy differences themselves.
If you would like to receive The Daily Update to your inbox, please email markets@epicip.com or click the link below.